|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Heart 1998;79:165-168 ( February )
a Department of Cardiology, G Papanikolaou General
Hospital, Exohi, Thessaloniki,
Greece, b Department of Cardiology, Academic Hospital
Maastricht, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ
Maastricht, Netherlands
Correspondence to: Dr Rodriguez.
Accepted for publication 6 October 1997
Objectives
To examine the effect of isoprenaline
on slow and fast pathway properties and tachycardia initiation.
Design
Consecutive patients, prospective study.
Setting
Referral centre for cardiology, academic hospital.
Patients
24 patients suffering from common type
atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT).
Interventions
Programmed electrical stimulation
and radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway.
Measurements and main results
AVNRT was induced
before and after the administration of isoprenaline in nine patients
(group 1), before isoprenaline only in five (group 2), and after
isoprenaline only in 10 (group 3). The anterograde effective refractory
period of the fast pathway was prolonged significantly during
isoprenaline administration in group 1 (405 (31) v
335 (34) ms, p < 0.001) and shortened in group 2 (308 (57)
v 324 (52) ms, p = 0.005). There was also significant shortening in group 3 (346 (85) v 395 (76) ms,
p < 0.001). Isoprenaline administration did not result in a
significant change of the anterograde effective refractory period of
the slow pathway in groups 1 and 3, but eliminated slow pathway
conduction in group 2. Isoprenaline significantly shortened the minimal
and maximal atrial to His bundle conduction interval recording in
response to each extrastimulus of the slow pathway (210 (24)
v 267 (25) ms, p < 0.001 and 275 (25) v
328 (25) ms, p < 0.001, respectively) in group 1 and significantly prolonged these intervals (331 (34) v 274 (34) ms and
407 (33) v 351 (33) ms, respectively) in group 3. In
all groups only minimal changes in the refractory period of the atrium
occurred after isoprenaline administration. The effect of isoprenaline
was also measured on the ventricular effective refractory period and on the minimal and maximal length of the ventriculoatrial
(V2-A2) interval during ventricular pacing.
Isoprenaline did not result in a significant change of the ventricular
effective refractory period in groups 1 and 2 nor of the shortest and
longest V2-A2 interval. In group 3, however,
the ventricular effective refractory period and the shortest and
longest V2-A2 interval shortened significantly after isoprenaline administration.
Conclusions
In group 1 isoprenaline did not affect
inducibility of AVNRT because it prolonged the fast pathway refractory
period without affecting slow pathway conduction. In group 2 isoprenaline shortened the fast pathway refractory period and appeared
to abolish slow pathway conduction. Consequencely, isoprenaline
prevented induction of AVNRT. In group 3 isoprenaline facilitated
induction of AVNRT. This effect seemed primarily to be the result of
shortening of retrograde refractoriness of the fast pathway with
prolongation of slow pathway anterograde conduction and refractory period.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Béa. Brembilla-Perrot, I. Muhanna, M. Nippert, B. Popovic, D. Beurrier, P. Houriez, A. Terrier de la Chaise, O. Claudon, P. Louis, A. Abdelaal, et al. Paradoxical effect of isoprenaline infusion Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(6): 621 - 627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Weismuller, S. Kuly, B. Brandts, K. Kattenbeck, C. Ranke, and H. J. Trappe Is electrical stimulation during administration of catecholamines required for the evaluation of success after ablation of atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardias? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 20, 2002; 39(4): 689 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |