|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Heart 1998;80:114-120 ( August )
Correspondence to: Dr R M Norris, Cardiac Department, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, East Sussex BN2 5BE, UK.
Accepted for publication 12 January 1998
Objective
To examine
the relation between time from onset of symptoms and coming under
ambulance and hospital care on fatality in patients with evolving acute
myocardial infarction, and on the proportions who survive because of
resuscitation and thrombolytic treatment.
Design
Prospective
community and hospital study over two years. Delay was measured from
the onset of symptoms to arrival at hospital, and from the onset to
coming under care from ambulance personnel.
Setting
Four
general hospitals serving three United Kingdom health districts.
Patients
2213 patients
under 75 years of age, 111 of whom had been successfully resuscitated
from out of hospital cardiac arrest.
Interventions
Resuscitation
from cardiac arrest; thrombolytic treatment.
Main outcome
measures
30 day fatality and lives saved by the
two forms of treatment.
Results
Times from
symptom onset to coming under hospital care and to starting
thrombolytic treatment (given to 53% of patients) were
1 hour in
15% and 2% of patients respectively,
2 hours in 54% and 25%,
and
4 hours in 67% and 55%. Overall, 30 day fatality was
138/1000 patients treated; 64/1000 (95% confidence interval 54 to 74)
survived because of treatment, and 80% of this salvage was
attributable to resuscitation. Delay was an important factor: 107/1000
(60 to 144) lives were saved for those coming under care within 1 hour
compared with 21/1000 (5 to 37) for those who delayed for more than 12 hours. Further analysis including the 111 patients with out of hospital
arrest showed that 34% of those coming to hospital by ambulance came
under ambulance care within 1 hour; for this subset, 30 day fatality
was 173/1000, and 136 (109 to 163) lives were saved by treatment.
Conclusions
Results of
treatment are strongly related to delay in coming under care. Reduction
in delay can reduce mortality from acute myocardial infarction.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Dracup, S. McKinley, L. V. Doering, B. Riegel, H. Meischke, D. K. Moser, M. Pelter, B. Carlson, L. Aitken, A. Marshall, et al. Acute Coronary Syndrome: What Do Patients Know? Arch Intern Med, May 26, 2008; 168(10): 1049 - 1054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Moser, L. P. Kimble, M. J. Alberts, A. Alonzo, J. B. Croft, K. Dracup, K. R. Evenson, A. S. Go, M. M. Hand, R. U. Kothari, et al. Reducing Delay in Seeking Treatment by Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and Stroke Council Circulation, July 11, 2006; 114(2): 168 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W Moore, F Kee, A. Evans, E. McCrum-Gardner, C Morrison, and H Tunstall-Pedoe Pre-hospital coronary care and coronary fatality in the Belfast and Glasgow MONICA populations Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2005; 34(2): 422 - 430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C F M Weston Pre-hospital resuscitation: breathing life into a stale subject Heart, October 1, 2004; 90(10): 1107 - 1109. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V Leah, C Clark, K Doyle, and T J Coats Does a single bolus thrombolytic reduce door to needle time in a district general hospital? Emerg. Med. J., March 1, 2004; 21(2): 162 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B Unal, J A Critchley, and S Capewell Missing, mediocre, or merely obsolete? An evaluation of UK data sources for coronary heart disease J Epidemiol Community Health, July 1, 2003; 57(7): 530 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Birkhead Where are we today? Early results from MINAP, the national audit of myocardial infarction project Heart, May 1, 2003; 89(90002): ii13 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Erhardt, J. Herlitz, L. Bossaert, M. Halinen, M. Keltai, R. Koster, C. Marcassa, T. Quinn, and H. van Weert Task force on the management of chest pain Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2002; 23(15): 1153 - 1176. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R M Norris A new performance indicator for acute myocardial infarction Heart, April 1, 2001; 85(4): 395 - 401. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J W Sayer, R A Archbold, P Wilkinson, S Ray, K Ranjadayalan, and A D Timmis Prognostic implications of ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction: new strategies required for further mortality reduction Heart, September 1, 2000; 84(3): 258 - 261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R M Norris CORONARY DISEASE: The natural history of acute myocardial infarction Heart, June 1, 2000; 83(6): 726 - 726. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Tackling myocardial infarction DTB, March 1, 2000; 38(3): 17 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Other Articles Noted Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 1999; 2(4): 105 - 112. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J S Birkhead Trends in the provision of thrombolytic treatment between 1993 and 1997 Heart, October 1, 1999; 82(4): 438 - 442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The falling mortality from coronary heart disease: a clinicopathological perspective Heart, August 1, 1998; 80(2): 121 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |