|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Heart 1998;80:453-458 ( November )
Department of
Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Erasmus
University, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
Correspondence to: Dr Kors.
Accepted for publication 30 April 1998
Objective
To establish a general method to
estimate the measuring error in QT dispersion (QTD) determination, and
to assess this error using a computer program for automated measurement
of QTD.
Subjects
Measurements were done on 1220 standard
simultaneous 12 lead electrocardiograms.
Design
The computer program was validated
against two observers on a random subset of 100 electrocardiograms.
Simple laws of physics require that at least five of the six extremity
leads have the same QT duration. This allows the direct assessment of
the error in measuring QTD derived from five extremity leads
(QTD5). It also enables ST-T amplitude dependent
distributions of measurement error in determining QT duration to be
established. These QT error distributions were then used to estimate
the error in measuring QTD from all 12 leads (QTD12).
Main outcome measures
Mean and standard
deviation of error in measuring QT duration, QTD5, and
QTD12.
Results
Performance of the program was
comparable to that of observers. Errors in measuring QT duration
(measured QT minus reference QT) fell from a mean (SD) of 6.9 (17.1) ms for ST-T amplitudes < 50 µV to
1.4 (6.3) ms for
amplitudes > 350 µV. Measurement errors of QTD5 and
QTD12 were 20.4 (11.5) ms and 29.4 (14.9) ms.
Conclusions
The fact that no QTD can exist
between five of the six extremity leads provides a means of estimating
QTD measurement error. Measuring error of QT duration is dependent on
ST-T amplitude. QTD measurement error is large compared with typical
QTD values reported.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Kligfield, L. S. Gettes, J. J. Bailey, R. Childers, B. J. Deal, E. W. Hancock, G. van Herpen, J. A. Kors, P. Macfarlane, D. M. Mirvis, et al. Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram: Part I: The Electrocardiogram and Its Technology A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 13, 2007; 49(10): 1109 - 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kligfield, L. S. Gettes, J. J. Bailey, R. Childers, B. J. Deal, E. W. Hancock, G. van Herpen, J. A. Kors, P. Macfarlane, D. M. Mirvis, et al. Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram: Part I: The Electrocardiogram and Its Technology: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology Circulation, March 13, 2007; 115(10): 1306 - 1324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Chen and F. M. Kusumoto QT Dispersion: Much Ado About Something? Chest, June 1, 2004; 125(6): 1974 - 1977. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Nash, C. P. Bradley, and D. J. Paterson Imaging Electrocardiographic Dispersion of Depolarization and Repolarization During Ischemia: Simultaneous Body Surface and Epicardial Mapping Circulation, May 6, 2003; 107(17): 2257 - 2263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Malik and V. N. Batchvarov Measurement, interpretation and clinical potential of QT dispersion J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2000; 36(6): 1749 - 1766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zabel, B. Acar, T. Klingenheben, M. R. Franz, S. H. Hohnloser, and M. Malik Analysis of 12-Lead T-Wave Morphology for Risk Stratification After Myocardial Infarction Circulation, September 12, 2000; 102(11): 1252 - 1257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zabel, M. R. Franz, J. A. Kors, G. van Herpen, and J. H. van Bemmel The Electrophysiological Basis of QT Dispersion: Global or Local Repolarization? Response Circulation, June 27, 2000; 101 (25): e235 - e236. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.L. Woods QT dispersion in ischaemic heart disease Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2000; 21(6): 432 - 433. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Kors, G. van Herpen, and J. H. van Bemmel QT Dispersion as an Attribute of T-Loop Morphology Circulation, March 23, 1999; 99(11): 1458 - 1463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. L. M. Jordaens The clinical value of QTdispersion: new perspectives on the assessment of cardiac repolarization more than 75 years after Bazett's formula Europace, January 1, 1999; 1(2): 73 - 76. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W MACFARLANE Measurement of QT dispersion Heart, November 1, 1998; 80(5): 421 - 423. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zabel, M. Malik, K. Hnatkova, V. Papademetriou, A. Pittaras, R. D. Fletcher, and M. R. Franz Analysis of T-Wave Morphology From the 12-Lead Electrocardiogram for Prediction of Long-Term Prognosis in Male US Veterans Circulation, March 5, 2002; 105(9): 1066 - 1070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |