|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Heart 1998;80:570-577 ( December )
a Department of Public Health, University of Ghent, De
Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Gent, Belgium, b School of Public Health, Free University of Brussels,
Belgium, c Division of Epidemiology, School
of Public Health, University of Minnesota, USA
Correspondence to: Dirk De Bacquer email: dirk.debacquer{at}rug.ac.be
Accepted for publication 2 September 1998
Objective
To study abnormalities in the resting
ECG as independent predictors for all cause, cardiovascular disease
(CVD), and coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality in a population based
random sample of men and women, and to explore whether their prognostic
value is different between sexes.
Design and subjects
An age and sex stratified
random sample was selected from the total Belgian population aged 25 to
74 years. Baseline data were gathered and resting ECGs were classified
according to Minnesota code criteria. The sample was then followed for
at least 10 years with respect to cause specific death. Results are
based on observations from 5208 men and 4746 women free from prevalent
CHD at the start of the follow up period.
Results
Although the prevalence of major
abnormalities in general was comparable between sexes, women had more
ischaemic findings, ST segment changes, and abnormal T waves on their
baseline ECG, while men showed more arrhythmias, bundle branch blocks,
and left ventricular hypertrophy. Fitting the multiplicative effect on subsequent mortality between all ECG classifications under study and
sex indicated that the prognostic value of ECG changes was equal in
women and men. Independently of other risk factors and other major ECG
changes, almost all ECG classifications were significantly related to
all cause, CVD, and CHD mortality. The most predictive ECG findings for
CVD death were ST segment depression (risk ratio (RR) 4.71), major ECG
findings (RR 3.26), left ventricular hypertrophy (RR 2.79), bundle
branch blocks (RR 2.58), T wave flattening (RR 2.47), ischaemic ECG
findings (RR 2.35), and arrhythmias (RR 2.15). The prognostic value of
major ECG findings for CVD and CHD death was more powerful than well
established cardiovascular risk factors.
Conclusions
Abnormalities in the baseline ECG are
strongly associated with subsequent all cause, CVD, and CHD mortality.
Their predictive value was similar for men and women.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T H Jafar, Z Qadri, and N Chaturvedi Coronary artery disease epidemic in Pakistan: more electrocardiographic evidence of ischaemia in women than in men Heart, April 1, 2008; 94(4): 408 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Strom Moller, B. Zethelius, J. Sundstrom, and L. Lind Persistent ischaemic ECG abnormalities on repeated ECG examination have important prognostic value for cardiovascular disease beyond established risk factors: a population-based study in middle-aged men with up to 32 years of follow-up Heart, September 1, 2007; 93(9): 1104 - 1110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Strom Moller, J. Haggstrom, B. Zethelius, B. Wiberg, J. Sundstrom, and L. Lind Age and follow-up time affect the prognostic value of the ECG and conventional cardiovascular risk factors for stroke in adult men J Epidemiol Community Health, August 1, 2007; 61(8): 704 - 712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Denes, J. C. Larson, D. M. Lloyd-Jones, R. J. Prineas, and P. Greenland Major and Minor ECG Abnormalities in Asymptomatic Women and Risk of Cardiovascular Events and Mortality JAMA, March 7, 2007; 297(9): 978 - 985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Okin Electrocardiography in Women: Taking the Initiative Circulation, January 31, 2006; 113(4): 464 - 466. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Rautaharju, C. Kooperberg, J. C. Larson, and A. LaCroix Electrocardiographic Abnormalities That Predict Coronary Heart Disease Events and Mortality in Postmenopausal Women: The Women's Health Initiative Circulation, January 31, 2006; 113(4): 473 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Rautaharju, C. Kooperberg, J. C. Larson, and A. LaCroix Electrocardiographic Predictors of Incident Congestive Heart Failure and All-Cause Mortality in Postmenopausal Women: The Women's Health Initiative Circulation, January 31, 2006; 113(4): 481 - 489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. H. Diercks, H. L. Hillege, A. d J. van Boven, J. A. Kors, H. J. G. M. Crijns, D. E. Grobbee, P. E. de Jong, and W. H. van Gilst Microalbuminuria modifies the mortality risk associated with electrocardiographic ST-T segment changes J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 16, 2002; 40(8): 1401 - 1407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. De Bacquer and G. De Backer Electrocardiographic findings and global coronary risk assessment Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2002; 23(4): 268 - 270. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.T. Larsen, J. Dahlin, H. Blackburn, H. Scharling, M. Appleyard, B. Sigurd, and P. Schnohr Prevalence and prognosis of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy, ST segment depression and negative T-wave. The Copenhagen City Heart Study Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2002; 23(4): 315 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W MACFARLANE Minnesota coding and the prevalence of ECG abnormalities Heart, December 1, 2000; 84(6): 582 - 584. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D De Bacquer, G De Backer, and M Kornitzer Prevalences of ECG findings in large population based samples of men and women Heart, December 1, 2000; 84(6): 625 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. H. Kuller, P. Velentgas, J. Barzilay, N. J. Beauchamp, D. H. O’Leary, and P. J. Savage Diabetes Mellitus : Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease and Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2000; 20(3): 823 - 829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Grundy, T. Bazzarre, J. Cleeman, R. B. D’Agostino Sr, M. Hill, N. Houston-Miller, W. B. Kannel, R. Krauss, H. M. Krumholz, R. M. Lauer, et al. Prevention Conference V : Beyond Secondary Prevention : Identifying the High-Risk Patient for Primary Prevention : Medical Office Assessment : Writing Group I Circulation, January 4, 2000; 101 (1): e3 - e11. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |